Lipid nanoparticles do not simply disappear like they say in the literature. They vary in size, charge, and behavior, and after injection they are taken up by muscle, lymph, and blood. Some are metabolized over days to weeks, but no one can track every particle. Tiny amounts could persist in tissues longer than studies can measure. I found this article damning. https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)01450-4
2. Why were repeated doses and boosters pushed?
Two doses were supposed to provide lasting protection, but when that failed, repeated dosing was normalized across populations. Historical records, such as the Ciba Foundation Future of Man conference, show that some scientific elites have openly discussed population control strategies (they talked about putting things in the water, etc...), eugenics, and behavioral control. https://archive.org/details/manhisfutureciba00wols/page/n5/mode/2up
Repeated dosing can be seen as a system-level "intervention" that imposes continual biological exposure, whether or not the supposed immune response justifies it. The intent of why is up for debate.
3. What about women’s fertility and miscarriages?
There are studies that indicate adverse pregnancy outcomes, though most focus on spike protein mechanisms (I don't think viruses or spike protein exists). You can search VAERS and see some reports firsthand. Fertility and early pregnancy are sensitive to disruption, and repeated exposure to nanoparticles may play a role. Reports of spontaneous miscarriages and menstrual irregularities are often dismissed as anecdotal, but widespread patterns could indicate unrecognized biological effects. I don't like all the germ theory nonsense in this paper and think it's malarky...but there definitely is issues with reproduction. Only time will tell with fertility. https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf
A truly perfect article bringing together my random thoughts as some of this information was released over the years. As you may recall, taking aspirin was vilified. And so much for “shedding” which muddied the waters as intended. Mass hypnosis. These three little words should have alerted more minds: the ferrets died.
Nothing short of a BRILLIANT post. I learned a great deal. Thank you.
Thank you.
Wondering if these lipids ever get excreted or otherwise dealt with by the blood?
Why were boosters being pushed, if two doses was enough?
Anyone know about the longer term effect on women's fertility?
1. What happens to the lipids in the body?
Lipid nanoparticles do not simply disappear like they say in the literature. They vary in size, charge, and behavior, and after injection they are taken up by muscle, lymph, and blood. Some are metabolized over days to weeks, but no one can track every particle. Tiny amounts could persist in tissues longer than studies can measure. I found this article damning. https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(21)01450-4
2. Why were repeated doses and boosters pushed?
Two doses were supposed to provide lasting protection, but when that failed, repeated dosing was normalized across populations. Historical records, such as the Ciba Foundation Future of Man conference, show that some scientific elites have openly discussed population control strategies (they talked about putting things in the water, etc...), eugenics, and behavioral control. https://archive.org/details/manhisfutureciba00wols/page/n5/mode/2up
Repeated dosing can be seen as a system-level "intervention" that imposes continual biological exposure, whether or not the supposed immune response justifies it. The intent of why is up for debate.
3. What about women’s fertility and miscarriages?
There are studies that indicate adverse pregnancy outcomes, though most focus on spike protein mechanisms (I don't think viruses or spike protein exists). You can search VAERS and see some reports firsthand. Fertility and early pregnancy are sensitive to disruption, and repeated exposure to nanoparticles may play a role. Reports of spontaneous miscarriages and menstrual irregularities are often dismissed as anecdotal, but widespread patterns could indicate unrecognized biological effects. I don't like all the germ theory nonsense in this paper and think it's malarky...but there definitely is issues with reproduction. Only time will tell with fertility. https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf
Thank you for your comprehensive reply Me Stuff.
I hope that others benefit from it also.
There's still a lot of healthy babies being born to vaccinated mothers, so there's a lot of unknowns.
A lottery in some regards and a real horror for the unlucky.
A truly perfect article bringing together my random thoughts as some of this information was released over the years. As you may recall, taking aspirin was vilified. And so much for “shedding” which muddied the waters as intended. Mass hypnosis. These three little words should have alerted more minds: the ferrets died.
As usual, excellent work! The lies those moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) tell.