8 Comments
Oct 17Liked by Me Stuff

I hope this stack is widely-read. As I read through it I found so many of the names of the evil orgs. that I have been reading the last 2 or 3 years in articles exposing the Plan-demic of Covid, Like: Johns-Hopkins, Chapel Hill NC, etc. I subscribed to a number of excellent researchers during the Plan-demic who have educated me regarding the long history of Eugenics and humanity has been kept ignorant of that history for far too long. The good old USA has been, along with Great Britain, pushing Eugenics for many generations. Hitler/Germany were not the originators of their evil. They took their cues from the main Eugeniciists in England and America. WAKE UP, PEOPLE. Bill Gates, his father before him, most of the big shots for generations have been part of it. The Bush crime family had the same views. People get rich and powerful, not by good deeds but by evil-doing. Just dig hard enough on them and the evil will turn up.

Expand full comment

No virus of any kind has been proven to exist. And beyond THAT... Contagion has never been proven, either. There Rockefeller lies, taught as "truth" in His schools, publishing, and media for fear factor - profit in selling His petro-"medicines" and jabs, and control, built the foundation of the plannedemic.

And planned it was - decades, if not a century and more.

And the thing that allows all this? The tool They have? Money. And money's foundational function is to account for the energy We each add into a system.

Accounting For the Energy We Add (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/accounting-for-the-energy-we-add

Expand full comment
author

Very true. And I was today years old when I learned that they used to use things like mercury and arsenic to treat issues like "syphilis" and "leprosy." But...they also used to use mercury and arsenic based pesticides in agriculture and as birth control. So what came first...the mercury and arsenic poisoning...or the STIs and leprosy??? Hmmm? LOL. I wonder how many of the Tuskegee Experiment "participants" had actually been exposed to mercury or arsenic either through agricultural means or through their "treatment" of their "syphilis" with mercury or arsenic or both????? Was the study really just to see the sterilizing effects of these substances on this population? Were they giving these people mercury or arsenic? It wouldn't surprise me. They literally told the participants they were testing their bad blood so my hypothesis that this is what they were doing doesn't seem far off? The syphilis/not giving penicillin study never made sense really. Incoming substack....

Expand full comment