Rothschild Descendant Dr. Charles Daniel Lane
The Forgotten Pioneer of mRNA Technology?
In the history of molecular biology, certain names dominate the conversation—Katalin Karikó, Drew Weissman, Moderna’s Stéphane Bancel and Dr. Robert Langer, and even BioNTech’s Dr. Uğur Şahin and Dr. Özlem Türeci.
Oh What a Tangled web we Weave!
Utilizing publicly available data on PitchBook, Foster Coulson, David Lopez, and Brandon Kuemper’s Integro Cap PitchBook website revealed that a United Nations (UN) linked group, Unreasonable Group, had co-invested in Integro Cap, but that data has since been removed/hidden on
From Cancer to COVID
BioNTech's pandemic narrative is often spun as a "miracle" of science, one that rocketed forward under the fittingly titled "Project Lightspeed," a name that ironically matches their high-stakes race to market. Wit…
Yet, one name that rarely appears in discussions of mRNA technology is Dr. Charles Daniel Lane. His early research in the 1970s on mRNA expression systems arguably laid the foundation for much of today’s work on mRNA-based therapies.
Who is Charles Daniel Lane?
Charles Daniel Lane (good luck finding pics of him) was born in 1948 and became a British molecular biologist known for his work on mRNA technology. Lane, along with Sir John Gurdon and Gerard Marbaix, developed an innovative technique involving the injection of foreign mRNA into Xenopus oocytes (frog egg cells). Gurdon and Marbaix have been involved with some impressive and diverse research.
This breakthrough allowed researchers to study gene expression in a living system, effectively creating a “biological test tube.” The significance of this work cannot be overstated—it provided a crucial method for understanding how cells produce proteins from injected mRNA.
Lane completed his doctoral thesis at Oxford University in 1971, titled The Microinjection of RNA into Eggs and Oocytes of Xenopus Laevis. His research demonstrated that foreign mRNA could be introduced into living cells to produce functional proteins, setting the stage for decades of advances in mRNA biology. In 1976, Lane published an article in Scientific American titled “Rabbit Hemoglobin from Frog Eggs”, further expanding on the concept of using oocytes to analyze protein synthesis.
Lane’s Role in mRNA Technology
While Lane did not patent any mRNA-related discoveries (that I could find), his work directly influenced the field. His research into how oocytes translate foreign mRNA provided one of the earliest experimental models for studying mRNA therapeutics.
Lane's work on mRNA technology has largely been overlooked, even though it laid the groundwork for later developments by Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman in the field of vaccine research. Unlike Karikó and Weissman, who focused on medical applications, Lane's contributions stayed more within the domain of basic research. This raises the question of why his work is so often left out of conversations about the evolution of mRNA technology.
His Family History: A Legacy of Intelligence and Aristocracy
Lane’s scientific brilliance may have had deep roots in his family history. His father, Captain George Lane (born Lanyi György), was a Hungarian-born British soldier, aristocrat, and World War II intelligence officer. George Lane was part of a covert British reconnaissance mission in occupied France during the war. He was captured by the Germans and personally interrogated by Field Marshal Erwin Rommel before being sent to a prisoner-of-war camp. After escaping and finding refuge with his brother-in-law, Victor Rothschild, in Paris, he was awarded the Military Cross for his role in the Tarbrush raids. Later naturalized as British in 1946, he helped run his wife’s estate until their divorce in 1957. He moved to the U.S. to work as a stockbroker and married Elizabeth Heald, daughter of Conservative politician Sir Lionel Heald, in 1963, settling in London.
After the war, George Lane married Dame Miriam Rothschild in 1943, linking Charles Lane to one of the most influential banking and scientific dynasties in Europe. The Rothschilds were not only known for their financial empire but also for their contributions to science and philanthropy. Miriam Rothschild, a distinguished scientist in her own right, was a leading authority in entomology and parasitology.
Charles Lane’s connection to such an “elite” scientific and Rothschild aristocratic lineage makes his relative obscurity in the history of mRNA technology all the more striking.
His father’s military intelligence background and his mother’s scientific contributions shaped a man who would make significant advances in molecular biology—only to be largely “forgotten” (similar to the efforts of his relative, Dr. Baron Henri de Rothschild, in the 19th and 20th centuries—particularly in areas such as infant nutrition and pasteurization, among many other “research” contributions with Ehrlich, Madame Curie and so much more).
DR CHARLES DANIEL LANE (b1948) – your current host at The Lady Rothschild Holiday Houses enjoyed a remarkable career as a molecular biologist who along with colleagues Gerard Marbaix and John Gurdon discovered the oocyte exogenous mRNA expression system – a system that not only reveals aspects of the control of gene expression but also provides a “living test tube” for the study of macromolecules: such an whole cell system also shows the merits of a non-reductionist approach, and the possibility of mRNA therapeutics. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Daniel_Lane and Dr Lane’s scientific papers here: www.ohllimited.co.uk/the-ashton-estate/dr-charles-lane
Although Dr Lane lives on Jersey his appreciation of the natural world and the many architecturally significant buildings on the Ashton Estate has never waned – which is self evident by the hard work and dedication he and his UK management company OHL Limited do to ensure that the CDL Sector of Ashton Estate and Ashton Wold remains an oasis of natural flora and fauna dotted with magnificent unique buildings.
Very interesting family.
Why Does This Matter Now?
The explosion of mRNA-based medicine—particularly with COVID-19 vaccines and now cancer and AI—has led to renewed interest in the origins of this technology. Given that Lane’s work in the late 1960s-1970s established key experimental systems for mRNA research, his omission from the modern narrative is curious.
Was Lane’s work deliberately overlooked in favor of more commercially viable figures? Or was it simply lost in the broader history of scientific progress on purpose? It really seems like the Rothschild family has been busy scrubbing away their fingerprints from the scenes of their historical misdeeds—and this is just another example. Either way, as mRNA technology continues to shape the future of medicine, the contributions of Charles Daniel Lane deserve recognition.
Could his pioneering work in mRNA technology decades ago be part of the reason why this technology is being pushed so aggressively today? That question remains open for debate—but the facts of Lane’s work and his family’s legacy speak for themselves.
It’s almost like all of this is connected somehow??? Hmmmm???
I suppose that everyone has heard that no possible mRNA protein has been found in the vaccines, by Substackers looking microscopically for proteins.
The idea thus being that this gene therapy business is a lie.
Why would pharma and therefore the US military want to lie about this?
That it was touted as being a genetic experiment is how come I initially knew that I didn't want any.
Was it a lie designed to normalise this concept of genetic modification via injection.
These cancer vaccines might not contain genetic editing mRNA either.
They might just be more of the usual maiming and killing by needle.
Some celebrities will say that their cancer disappeared and people will queue up and pay up to get some.
That a Rothschild came up with the brilliant scam must be kept secret for fear of creating *cancer vaccine hesitancy*.
We still don't know what's in the shots, partly because the ingredients are inconsistent, which makes sense that lots of different experiments are being carried out.
Except individuals are not followed up to actually monitor the effects, so how is the data for AI training sourced.