yup.... 'bout a quarter of mah own com'mints 're hidden now...on one hand it shows that their AllGoRhythms cain't decipher Crackpotese! (cuz I ain't said nuttin' in-scenty-airy)... on the other... it shows how baaaad the AI is... an' on the third (cuz why not 3 hands?!) it means that Big Brudder's flexin' his censor-tensors...
I wonder how they pick which ones to censor? LAME! I didn't even see that comment before and it's pretty interesting. Glad I caught it! They need to keep the censor tensors off the Stacks!
yup, you kin unhide but they don't appear "in the thread" in context unless ya KNOW ta look & unhide--so folks miss out on good stuff... Substack's still better'n other platforms but this is a har(de)harbinger of not-good things ta come... Yep, it's not a human--a human picks words, phrases... but it's all AI...bad-rotten-evil-AI at the behest of bad-rotten-evil humans! Nobuddy asked fer this, that's fer sure :-(
Most of us on C&C that day couldn't figure out what was going on. It wasn't as if the comments were offensive or anything. If anything, they were benign.
Interesting. The family name mentioned in there, it has a specific meaning besides being a family name. Would an algorithm have tried to (in this case, erroneously) suppress awareness of presumed discussions that operate on the dichtomy of "..." vs Gentile?
....I've seen it called the "censorship-industrial complex"....& sadly, it's VERY REAL....yes, "Terminator" & "The Matrix" ARE BOTH "predictive programming, & documentaries....
Substack is co-founded by Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, and Jairaj Sethi, with Chris Best serving as the CEO. Unfortunately I think AI is being pushed on all of us unless there is a major revolt against it...which I also don't see happening any time soon. Love my followers!
It seems I thouched a nerve with the algorithm. I know any one of the topics I brought up are "controversial" but I do think it has quite a bit to do with mentioning Dr. Wood.
There was quite an effort to conceal her findings and that of Dr. Morgan Reynolds. There are many other names of excellent sources for info about infinite perpetual energy production.
There are many that are aware that technology that could help humanity is being used to control it.
My intention is to design one such device to prove it is mechanically possible and that the dynamics work, and distribute that design freely, declaring it property of all sentient life. Patenting would be asking for trouble.
I noticed that as well. One of my own comments was moved - within a minute of posting - to Hidden Replies under John Leake's Christine Cotton article, in which he suggested that Cotton may have been the victim of thallium poisoning or another covert toxic exposure.
That made me wonder: why are possibilities such as thallium poisoning or covert toxic exposures openly considered, while repeated mass PCR testing remains virtually off-limits as a topic of discussion, despite Denis Rancourt's data showing excess mortality peaks repeatedly following large-scale testing campaigns among the elderly?
Everyone uses the test to measure reality, yet almost nobody investigates whether the test itself was part of that reality.
Anyhow, in the spirit of reanimating my hidden reply a little:
"" Mir
4 jun
Interesting that thallium poisoning, nerve agents and covert toxic exposures immediately come to mind - yet repeated mass nasopharyngeal PCR testing never seems to enter the discussion.
Given Rancourt's data (see below) showing excess mortality peaks repeatedly following large-scale testing campaigns among the elderly, why is the physical impact of the testing itself still treated as a blind spot?
Christine was a strong advocate of PCR testing, making it entirely plausible that she underwent repeated testing herself. Why is this possibility never even considered?
yup.... 'bout a quarter of mah own com'mints 're hidden now...on one hand it shows that their AllGoRhythms cain't decipher Crackpotese! (cuz I ain't said nuttin' in-scenty-airy)... on the other... it shows how baaaad the AI is... an' on the third (cuz why not 3 hands?!) it means that Big Brudder's flexin' his censor-tensors...
I wonder how they pick which ones to censor? LAME! I didn't even see that comment before and it's pretty interesting. Glad I caught it! They need to keep the censor tensors off the Stacks!
yup, you kin unhide but they don't appear "in the thread" in context unless ya KNOW ta look & unhide--so folks miss out on good stuff... Substack's still better'n other platforms but this is a har(de)harbinger of not-good things ta come... Yep, it's not a human--a human picks words, phrases... but it's all AI...bad-rotten-evil-AI at the behest of bad-rotten-evil humans! Nobuddy asked fer this, that's fer sure :-(
It did let me unhide it though. If you have any good comments you want to share with all the people's you can unhide the good stuff.
They're grossly unEthical on this platform, too! So sad.
About a week ago, some of the comments were being hidden on the Covid & Coffee substack too.
Very weird! Wish they wouldn't do that. Thank you for letting me know.
Most of us on C&C that day couldn't figure out what was going on. It wasn't as if the comments were offensive or anything. If anything, they were benign.
Interesting. The family name mentioned in there, it has a specific meaning besides being a family name. Would an algorithm have tried to (in this case, erroneously) suppress awareness of presumed discussions that operate on the dichtomy of "..." vs Gentile?
Would love to know. Very odd that it was hidden.
....I've seen it called the "censorship-industrial complex"....& sadly, it's VERY REAL....yes, "Terminator" & "The Matrix" ARE BOTH "predictive programming, & documentaries....
SS turned on Settings/Community/Enable automatic moderation.
I turned it off.
I hope Substack does not go by way of Twitter. Who owns Substack btw? Boy your followers are the cream... How do we keep the AI element out?
Substack is co-founded by Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, and Jairaj Sethi, with Chris Best serving as the CEO. Unfortunately I think AI is being pushed on all of us unless there is a major revolt against it...which I also don't see happening any time soon. Love my followers!
It seems I thouched a nerve with the algorithm. I know any one of the topics I brought up are "controversial" but I do think it has quite a bit to do with mentioning Dr. Wood.
There was quite an effort to conceal her findings and that of Dr. Morgan Reynolds. There are many other names of excellent sources for info about infinite perpetual energy production.
There are many that are aware that technology that could help humanity is being used to control it.
My intention is to design one such device to prove it is mechanically possible and that the dynamics work, and distribute that design freely, declaring it property of all sentient life. Patenting would be asking for trouble.
Thank you Drew. Glad I happened to catch your comment! Look forward to seeing what you do in the future. Here's to many great successes!
I noticed that as well. One of my own comments was moved - within a minute of posting - to Hidden Replies under John Leake's Christine Cotton article, in which he suggested that Cotton may have been the victim of thallium poisoning or another covert toxic exposure.
That made me wonder: why are possibilities such as thallium poisoning or covert toxic exposures openly considered, while repeated mass PCR testing remains virtually off-limits as a topic of discussion, despite Denis Rancourt's data showing excess mortality peaks repeatedly following large-scale testing campaigns among the elderly?
Everyone uses the test to measure reality, yet almost nobody investigates whether the test itself was part of that reality.
Anyhow, in the spirit of reanimating my hidden reply a little:
"" Mir
4 jun
Interesting that thallium poisoning, nerve agents and covert toxic exposures immediately come to mind - yet repeated mass nasopharyngeal PCR testing never seems to enter the discussion.
Given Rancourt's data (see below) showing excess mortality peaks repeatedly following large-scale testing campaigns among the elderly, why is the physical impact of the testing itself still treated as a blind spot?
Christine was a strong advocate of PCR testing, making it entirely plausible that she underwent repeated testing herself. Why is this possibility never even considered?
Rancourt, from minute 34:05:
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-what-really-caused ""