19 Comments
User's avatar
The BarefootHealer's avatar

πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ˜‰Its good to see more questions being asked about this strangely polarised topicπŸ˜‰

Btw, every condition, and effects mentioned, are also caused by screwing up your light environment. Every single one.πŸ˜πŸ€”πŸ€¨ See photobiomodulation science around the matter.πŸ˜‰ Even the "new wave", of mitochondrial experts, are missing alot of the picture.

Your microbiome is affected by light.😐

The reason Ivermectin should not be taken long term or unless you have end stage cancers, is because it screws up your microtubules within each cell, which help to capture, vibrate and communicate light, not just within your cells, but throughout your body systems but most importantly it communicates light to your microbiome and any biome within the body.😐🀨

When you screw up your light network, you can't MAKE your own light, which means your light environment becomes even more important. And currently our light environments are sucky and killing us! Plus, it screws up your capacity to think clearly.πŸ˜‰ Handy right?!πŸ€”πŸ˜‰πŸ€¨

#youRlight #lightISnutrition #lightisALWAYStheanswer #follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

They want ivermectin withdrawn globally cos it’s killing rivers. Maybe this is the industry making as much profit as it can in the short term :(

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

I take nothing pushed by pHARMa. Thanks for this!!!

Expand full comment
Kraig Carroll's avatar

When Merck was being sued by the families of victims from the Arthritic drug called VIOXX, every case that went to the jury, were awarding tens of million's to the families to the turn of Merck stopped fighting in court and started making deals. It was reported back in the 80's that in the year Merck paid out over a billion in damages in the year they produced profits of 29 billion! Then there is Merck and the evil known as Gardasil, originally to prevent cancer's of the cervix in young girls not yet sexually active. Then before long here they are saying Gardasil is good for young boys and as just about all of know the boys do not have a cervix, then before long and using the same Gardasil for babies, and lastly they came after my group, seniors with this same 'vaccine'! Texas for reasons unknown to me, on the advice of one Merck rep. then Governor Perry with a republican controlled house and senate , mandated this poison that just in Texas alone had either killed/murdered many young Texas girls or has the whole families lives changed forever in caring for very damaged young girls from Merck's insanity! And a side note from Dr. L. Horowitz's book "Emerging Viruses, Aids to Ebola, Accident, Nature or Intentional", the first known Ebola out break in Africa happened just two miles from a Merck Lab!

Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

Love this info you shared! Exxxxactly! But I am sure the Merck Mectizan (ivermectin) is safe...right? :) History is so important!

Expand full comment
Kraig Carroll's avatar

Thank you. For the record, have been parasite free and all the furkids who have graced my life too for the past twenty-eight years. That crap called menbenzoldolesp? the ben is the dangerous to deadly toxic chemical benzene. Benzene (Fenben too) is what took my late, beautiful wife's life and thousands of Viet Nam Vets from Agent Orange exposures that produced the same exact health issues as my wife who never got near Viet Nam nor Agent Orange but was expossed as a young girl to benzene. This is all from all things crude oil under the name of Sodium Benzoate, meds, vaccines, /rockerfellers/rothschilds as these two are who brought this evil to us in the first place, benzene is a by-product of crude oil refining, it is a cheap solvent that some sorry sob found out , mixes well in the creation of soooo many other toxic 'things. Like gay men's lubricants that produce the same exact symptoms as the Aids virus, ladies feminine products under the name of paraBENS, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, paints, glues, dyes, inks, food preservatives, explosives , laundry detergents and more.

Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

I am sorry to hear about your wife. Thank you for sharing this info. They pushed out albendazole on poor people too…but I just focused on the ivermectin part. I wish more people would wake up to it all! They make poisoning people sound so philanthropic and sciency! https://mectizan.org/news_resources/river-blindness-life-cycle/

Expand full comment
Kraig Carroll's avatar

Thank you and you are most welcome. In my 28 year in personal toxic chemical research, painfully learned about cancer and diabetes, both of which my lady lived thru, and the r and r connection to the biggest cancer producer on the planet, the very dangerous toxic chemical benzene. It was known as far back as the 1890's by the doctors and scientists of the day that benzene caused both and still the r and r crowd brought this evil to us, Then in 1927, the Spellman-Rockefeller Foundation was created that in 1955 morphed into todays American Cancer Society who has gone thru tens of billion's in research and still not one damn CURE. My wife and i spent about two thousand dollars 28 years ago, did it naturally and was never again and issue for her and she was 30 years insulin dependent when we did this, which should have made impossible for her. Powerful supplements and the concept of Alkalinity is how we did this, with outstanding guidance from a great Naturopathic Doctor. If money could fix anything, cancer does not exist as ACS has gone thru Billion's and still no cure's!. Every ND i know has cured cancer and many have cured diabetes, as my wife and i did but not in the rockefeller controlled medical world!

Expand full comment
Mr Tardigrade UK's avatar

48mg daily for 3 months.

I’m fine. Cured cancer and IBS.

The IVM hoax is a PayOp.

Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

Sure.

Expand full comment
A T's avatar

https://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=sma

Streptomyces from traditional medicine: sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7642979/

Very recently, an antibiotic-producing strain of thermotolerant Streptomyces sp. TM32 was isolated from the rhizosphere of Curcuma longa L., a medicinal plant [16]. This is believed to be a new strain of Streptomyces sioyaensis that has strong antimicrobial activities against both human and plant pathogens, including an antibiotic-resistant pathogen, Staphylococcus haemolyticusMR-CoNS [16]. It may also serve as an emerging source for further discovery of valuable and novel bioactive compounds.

*16. Nakaew N, Lumyong S, Sloan WT, Sungthong R. Bioactivities and genome insights of a thermotolerant antibiotics-producing Streptomyces sp. TM32 reveal its potentials for novel drug discovery. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8:e842. doi:Β 10.1002/mbo3.842. [PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Expand full comment
Cellularly Erased's avatar

I'm not in any particular 'camp' re Ivermectin and I certainly take your point about long term chronic use.

The question I would like to ask those stating it is actually another 'weapon' against us is - why is it prescription only in the UK and France and very difficult to get hold of?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

"Pharma" has a long history of taking nature’s medicine, making slight "modifications" (making it synthetic garbage) just to patent them, and somehow making them less effectiveβ€”or even harmfulβ€”in the process. Ivermectin is a perfect example. The original avermectins, like those found in certain plants and postbiotics, had powerful anti-parasitic properties (which it is very debatable about IF parasites are really harmful), but once Pharma got involved, it became about control and profit (and something that feels more nefarious). Meanwhile, something like turmeric, which also contains potent bioactive compounds, was never pushed on the poor. Instead, patented pharmaceuticals were handed out, and strangely, we saw simultaneous HIV outbreaks across Africa. It really makes you question what was being distributed and why natural solutions were never part of the agenda???

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

I believe that the notion of needing pharmaceutical interventions, like antibiotics or antivirals, is a testament to how effectively the system has influenced our thinking. The emphasis on germ theory and viruses has contributed to a dependency on pharmaceutical solutions, but there are alternative perspectives, such as terrain theory, that challenge these mainstream views.

I truly believe that viruses don't exist. They have never been isolated or proven to cause illness, despite what mainstream science suggests. There is a wealth of information from various reputable sources that challenges the virus narrative and offers alternative perspectives. I encourage you to explore some of my other work on the topic, which critiques the entire system. If my take doesn’t resonate with you, there are many other sources out there discussing the flaws in the current approach and presenting alternatives.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

I get where you're coming from, and I think a total reframing of the concept of "pathogens" is necessary. Germ theory, as it stands, presents microbes as these invisible threats lurking everywhere, out to get us, but if that were true, we’d all be gone by now. Microbes don't exist to harm usβ€”they’re just doing what microbes do. Take Clostridium botulinum for example, which causes botulism. It doesn't exist to kill us; it's simply trying to digest and survive in its environment. In fact, microbes, in general, often play a key role in breaking down dead or dying tissue or in balancing imbalances in ecosystems, including the human body. Their byproducts can sometimes be harmful, sure, but their primary role is more about cleaning up than causing harm.

Our bodies can get out of balance due to stress, lack of sleep, toxins, or even the media. When that happens, we’re more vulnerable, and microbes step in to help clean up the mess. It's like getting hit by a car and lying in the street. The toxins (the car) caused the accident, but then the microbes (the vultures) come in to clean up the mess. But instead of blaming the car for the crash, we’re blaming the vultures for circling around. The real issue is the toxins/poisons/stress, etc.. in our environment, not the microbes that are just doing their job to help us heal or digest our unhealthy carcasses (LOL). This helped me reframe the way I see the microbial worldβ€”not as threats, but as helpful cleanup crews keeping things in balance.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 29Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Me Stuff's avatar

It is evident that you have not read any of my Substacks. Good luck to you. πŸ––

Expand full comment
Debra Robinson's avatar

and ozone O3, which was set aside when antibiotics came on the scene.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ˜‰ Its good to see more thinking about the whole concept.

Calling something "naturally derived" does not mean it's safety profile is the same as when found in nature. It generally means that all the inherent, in built safety mechanisms that nature specifically packages it's molecules up in and also allows for synergistically safer, but generally "slower" effects, are gone. People believe that Pharma "derives" it's products from natural sources, without actually understanding the definition of the word.πŸ˜‰

Expand full comment